Saturday, February 25, 2017

Mir Suleman Daud Ahmedzai (centre) addressing ”The history of Balochistan revisited” at the House of Lords in London on February 23, 2017.

Mir Suleman Dawood Jan Ahmedzai

At extreme right is Bob Blackman, MP

His Highness the Khan of Kakat Suleman Daud speech in the house of lord 23/2/2017;
The British authorities in India did always consider Baluchistan as an independent and sovereign entity and never as part of the India . The 1854 and 1876 treaties between British government and the Khan of Kalat recognised Baluchistan as a sovereign country outside India. In the partition plan of 3 June 1947, both Pakistan and the British had accepted Kalat State's independence and sovereignty. The British withdrawal plan from India was announced the Viceroy of India decided whether to entrust the responsibility of the Leased lands to Kalat  (Baluchistan) or Pakistan.

This decision was in contravention of all international laws, as the area called British Baluchistan was leased out to British India by a treaty agreed upon by the sovereign Khan of Baluchistan and Britain. After British withdrawal, the area's should have been handed over to Kalat Baluchistan.

On the objection of Khan of Kalat, the British agreed that the question of the sovereignty over the leased areas would be discussed between the representatives of Pakistan and Kalat. But with the obvious assistance of British Assistant to Governor General in Baluchistan, a controversial and much manipulated referendum was held in Quetta . It was announced that the British Baluchistan has opted to join Pakistan.

On 4th August 1947, a three parties agreement was signed between Pakistan, the British and Kalat Baluchistan called, The Standstill Agreement, in which the sovereign status of Kalat Baluchistan was accepted. The article I of this agreement stated that: the Government of Pakistan recognises the status of Kalat as an independent sovereign state which has Treaty relations with the British Government, and whose position is different from that of other Indian states."

The Khan declared Kalat Baluchistan independent on 11th August 1947, three days before the independence of Pakistan. The Khan affirmed his intention to build Baluchistan as a prosperous sovereign country in which Baluch could retain their identity and live in accordance with their traditions. It will establish relations through treaties of friendship with neighbouring states of Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan as well as with India and the outside world. Soon after the independence elections were held to Baluchistan two legislature chambers and a period of tranquillity and peace ensured in the country.
In the meantime Pakistan began to pressurise the newly independent Kalat State to join Pakistan and an uneasy calm appeared in relations between Kalat and Pakistan. Talks between Pakistan and Kalat dragged on for fairly a long time. Pakistan continued to harass the Khan and Baluch State machinery on various pretexts. Pakistan was engaged in conspiracies and underhand tactics to compel the Khan to join Pakistan. On 26th March 1948 Pakistan army was ordered to move into Baluchistan coastal region of Pasni, Jiwani, and Turbat. This was the first act of aggression prior to the march on Capital Kalat by Pakistani military detachment on 1st April 1948.


1-      "The question of constitution positions on confederacy unit, tribal land, leased area and question of sovereignty of the Kharan and Lasbela.

The constitution position of Kharan and Lasbela had been regarded by the British as part of Kalat Baluchistan as two confederate units. Of which the Khan of Kalat was the sovereign.
The Sovereignty of leased land, (Nushki,Chagai (1899) agreement of Quetta and Nasserabad), remained with the Khan of Kalat.

1-      1947 independent and 1948 occupation of Baluchistan.

At first Jinnah tried to persuade the Khan of Kalat as the head of Baluch confederacies to join Pakistan. The Khan of Kalat put Jinnah proposal to the lower house and upper house in which both Baluch houses of Parliament rejected Jinnah's appeal instead the Parliaments proposed cooperation between the two states.
M.A. Jinnah was Kalat Baluchistan's lawyer, as the lawyer {Legal Adviser} he learnt a lot about the Baluch internal matters and Baluchistan politics. M.A. Jinnah wasted no time to use it against the Baluch.

After Pakistan's independence Jinnah was appointed Governor General of Pakistan.  
The British and new born Pakistan could not deny Baluchistan its independence.  After the independence Jinnah was encouraged by the British Ambassador at Karachi had change of heart about the independence of Baluchistan. Jinnah had managed to isolate the Khan of Kalat. The Pakistani forces had blockaded the Capital of Baluchistan Kalat and moved forces in Makran.
Makran was a district of Kalat.  Jinnah declared Makran as a princely state in order to sign agreement.



2-     Did the Jinnah have the mandate to declare Kharan, Lasbella and Mukran as princely states?

The Baluch confederacy was formed in the 12th century.  Kharan and lasbela were part of the Baluch confederacy which first formed in 12th century and survived in part till 1948. Constitutional position of Kharan (R/1/34/59) (Kalat state council R/134/52) the Khan of Kalat was the head of the Baluch confederacy.

Jinnah declared Makran a district of Kalat as princely State. Jinnah had no mandate to declare Kharan and Lasbela as princely States which were part of Baluch confederacy.

Nawab of Kharan and Jam of Lasbela during British India rule had requested the Crown representative to declare their states as princely states but the crown representative rejected their claims. The crown representative wrote to them that the Khan of Kalat as the head of Baluch confederacy is the sovereign.


A)     M.A. Jinnah had no legal mandate to clear the Kharan, Lasbela and Makran as princely states. Baluchistan was sovereign country and the Khan of Kalat as the head of the Baluch confederacy was the sovereign.

B)     The Nawab of Kharan and Jam of Lasbela also had no mandate to sign treaty with foreign power. To declare Makran as princely state was insult to the Baluch and international Standard.

4-Conclusion"

Ladies and gentlemen Baluchistan is occupied land. The Baluch are the victim of the geopolitics. Pakistan was allowed to occupy Kalat Baluchistan and has created a false narrative. The Baluch have acquired identity and ethno consciousness before the formulation of the nationalism doctrine. They have been a self-defining ethno culture through history even if they did not have the required sense of social and political solidarity to assert themselves as a nation as it is understood in today’s world.

The Baluch as proud Nation reject foreign domination and strive for an independent United Baluchistan. My appeal to the international community and specially the British Crown and Government. Is that to help us to gain our dignity and independence from the cradle of terrorist the Punjabi military state

No comments: