Wednesday, December 12, 2012

State violence has produced a culture of violence that will not be in the state favour.



For how long the state elites deceive its citizen by empty rhetoric. The expression of one sentiment will not feed any body. State are real, it has big machinery that can crush people and  deprive people from identity, land, state can force dominant group religion, language, culture on dominated groups. It is nothing more natural or unnatural about Iran, it is a state dominated by Persian glued together by Shiite religion.
States are not formed by divine ordinance. State boundaries are not everlasting, state boundaries are subject to changes. People want job, they want to be protected from external and internal threat.
 People want their way of live dignities are protected by state regardless of their, religion, colours, and language. When state failed to does that state lose its legitimacy. Group of people rise against the dominated group and carve their own state. The new states are always carved from the old states, empires.

Pakistan is an artificial state. Pakistan has many problems. The religious sectarian and rise of nationalism based on self-determination will finish Pakistan long before 2030. And Iran also faced with many challenges the Iranian internal challenges are much greater than external challenges. I do not think the both state have capabilities or expert knowledge to face the 21st century challenges. They have failed to identify their problems.  The Iranian or Pakistani have not got workable solutions for the internal problems, they blame external powers. By blaming the others the problems will not go away.
They always used state economic might to bribe the minority groups elites or use a force when a bribe failed to silence the elites. The use of force has worked in the states favours, both states economically weaker and cannot use the force for ever. Iran and Pakistan are using violence in order to silence the voices, State violence has produced a culture of violence that will not be in the state favour.
M. Sarjov

No comments: