By M. Sarjov
The Baluch struggle is for an independent modern state where gender equality, religious freedom, rule of law, property right and individual right are guaranteed by the State.
For hundreds of years, the world has been divided into a patchwork of states with clear boundaries.
Every piece of land belonging to one or
more groups of people and each human being supposedly belong to one of these entities,
which are self-contained within a hard shell of language, culture, religion and
tradition.
European states were created as early as 1648 yet the sense
of nationhood did not arise at the same time. Small European principalities united
together to create centralised states with demarked borders instead of the
previous peril frontiers. The new sovereign nation-states maintained armies and
governments.
Nation builders created national culture by creating a single
unified language for each nation from one of the local vernacular, standardised
its spelling and grammar and taught it in schools throughout the new state.
But in (Persia) Iran’s case nation-building started very
late. The European created the modern state for Iranian (the Great game)
Persian was not self-motivated to create a modern state. They were as they are today much more
interested to conquer their neighbours and to revitalise their mythical Persian
empire, then wait for the Hidden Imam to reappears and announce the end of the
world.
The Nation-builders in
Iran tried and failed to assimilate the resilient Baluch and Kurd, The Iranian
Shiite Turk have been the backbones of Modern Iran, better educated than
their Persian counterparts have maintained their language as well as their
vibrant Turkic culture and the Shiite Arab with fluency in Arabic, (Arabic is
the language of religion), resisted and survived the Persian assimilation
attempts, one state one culture, one language theory has failed in Iran. The
Persian did what they could do, bullying the Baluch, Turk, Arab, Kurd, and
levelled their culture, language as backward.
Multiculturalism has always been a centre of civilizations where people from diverse backgrounds can meet and stimulate each other through dialogue.
When communities within a state have different interests and permanently divided, differences between them cannot easily resolve.
Even in a democratic government majority dominated group outvoted minority group permanently out of power. The Baluch in Iran is one group that has been outvoted permanently
The Persian chauvinism is not able or unwilling to
understand the Baluch and other nationalities sentiments. By ignoring the long-standing issue of the Baluch right to self-determination such demand will not
disappear but actually will accumulate. The policymakers who seek to hold Iran
together failed and will fail to decentralise power from Tehran and transfer it
to the provinces. Iran’s state structure is cemented by the Shiite sect of Islam,
the ethnic politics in Iran will undo the Shiite control over the non-Persian
Shiite.
The causes of ethnic conflicts have always been the authoritarian
rules; the collapse of such rules make ethnic conflicts possible. The lid on
ancient rivalries will take off, long-suppressed grievances will be settled.
Iran is the next outdated authoritarian Shiite caliph on its way out. The
Iranian ethnic conflicts are not confined to one regime. The ethnics rivalries
and conflicts are a historical fact only temporarily suppressed and managed.
The Iranian opposition parties from liberal left to
central, those who believe in liberty, individual autonomy and rights to self-determination
can minimise upcoming ethnic violence in Iran. The best course of action is to
recognise and address ethnic problems early before violence and bloodshed
erupt. The Persian has numbers of an alternative to prevent ethnic
conflicts.
National right to self-determination
The national right to self-determination has been at the root
of modern politic debates the academic definition of national
self-determination are few and far between.
The Right to self-determination concept is associated with
democracy, the principle that citizens must be governed only with their own
consent. The Baluch in Iran are not governed by their consent and will not be
able to do so as long as the Baluch remains as a part of Iran. The Baluch are
the victims of the Persian subjugation. They have been protesting against
prolonged suffering and violation of their basic rights to live dignified lives.
The Persian chauvinism and Shiite Apartheid have refused to
share the state power and privileges, exploited the state resources, while they
economically deprived the Baluch of means to maintain a good life in Iran. The
Baluch as the Iranian citizens gaze at the State for security and economic
prosperity. There are security and economic prosperity in Baluchistan only for settlers and foreign investors. The Baluch have no security and the
Iranian security agencies are engaged in promoting inner tribal fights within
Baluchistan.
Liberation
The Baluch must win their struggle for an independent in order to preserve
their language, culture, tradition, economy and commitment to modernisation. A better democratic world cannot be created by transferring power to an imaginary
world parliament or the United Nations, but only by giving people influence over
the decision that affects their lives. The Baluch campaigner for independent
Baluchistan should propose that the Independent Baluchistan is achievable by
splitting Iran and giving The Baluch, Arab, Kurd, Turk, Persian control of
their lands on the basis of their historical cultural boundaries.
The principle of self-determination is supported as a means of
guaranteeing people right to have control over the law by which their lives are regulated.
The Baluch as the people have no representative in the Iranian government to
represent their common interests. The Baluch national Right to
self-determination is justifiable in Iran where there is an elected government
but the Baluch are facing the Human Right violation, systematic economic
deprivation and forceful removal from their ancestral home.
In Iran, people are free to vote but they are not free to
stand to be elected or elect a candidate of their own to represent them in the advisory council. The Guardian council select the candidate and then people are
free to vote for a candidate selected for the people by the Guardian council.
The Baluch in the western Baluchistan are aware of the fact that their votes do
not change anything.
Conclusion
As a consequence of the denial of national right to self-determination
there are many wars of liberation against apartheid regimes and states in the
world. The authoritarian regime and artificial states with one or more
nationalities are involved in internal or external wars.
It is wrong to blame
Nationalists for the violence which they bring since they have to react as
victims of injustice. The world opinion favour the Right to self-determination
as a solution. Today the Baluch are refusing to assimilate into Persian-
Shiite and demanding the Right to National self-determination. The Baluch
struggle is for an independent modern state, where gender equality, religious
freedom, rule of law, property right and individual right are guaranteed by the
State.
Appendix;
Nationalism is not a complete ideology in the same sense as
communism, Islam, Christianity; it does not suggest as an action plan of
universal scope. Nationalism only seeks to justify its own group. Nationalism
employs the ideal of self-determination. Nationalism may be popular within the
right, left, central, liberal and religious groups. Those who oppose the
self-determination are really undemocratic and allies of Chauvinism.
Mehrab. D. Sarjov is a Baluch political activist based in
London and campaign for an independent Baluchistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment