Enslaved Nation occupied and divided country, demoralized leadership;

Antiquity
In 1892 Lord Curzon wrote; Baluchistan comprises the Godrosia, and part of Drangina, of the ancients; and it is a significant illustration of the shadows that has rarely lifted from these region, and of the precarious political existence which till lately they enjoyed.
We can hardly attribute to the Persian monarchy the sea coast of Gedrosia or Mukran which extends along the Indian Ocean from cope of Jask to cope of Gwadar.
In the time of the Alexandra and probably many yeas afterwards, it was thinly inhabited by Baluch people who know little arts, who acknowledge no master, and who were divided by inhospitable desert from the rest of the world. It is an extraordinary, but never the less true from time of Alexandra’s march through Gedrosia and the navigation of his admiral along its shares we have no record of the visit of European to the interior of Baluchistan until 1809.
Enslaved Nation occupied and divided country, demoralized leadership;
Baluchistan coast has been divided between Iran and Pakistan. Baluchistan is the occupied land Baluch nation has never acknowledged the master and rightly should not acknowledge any master now. Baluch should send the clear massage to their leaders to say; an enslaved leader cannot lead the free nation, enslave prince cannot be a prince for free nation. Slave cannot choose it destiny, therefore Baluch nation can not follow the slave. The free man may die in the custody but he is mentally free. Any nation that governed by other men’s law is the slave nation. Baluch has been governed by the Pakistani and Persian law. Baluch has no right to govern themselves by their own law.
M.Sarjov